The Breast Milk Baby Doll – Because not all babies take bottles

28 responses to “The Breast Milk Baby Doll – Because not all babies take bottles”

1. Jennifer

   Jul 17, 2011 at 4:06 pm

   There was nary a bottle in our house either, and it has seemed bizarre to supply them for my 3-yr-old’s dolls. However, she can easily pretend to nurse them if she wants to without any bells and whistles! I only object to this toy for the same reason I dislike any doll that makes noises or moves. Just expensive and not necessary for imaginative play.

   Reply
2. BusyWorkingMama

   Jul 17, 2011 at 4:53 pm

   I’m 100% pro-breast feeding. But teaching my 4 year old to do it? Umm….creepy. No thanks!

   Reply
3. Jen E @ mommablogsalot

   Jul 17, 2011 at 5:18 pm

   Apart from the price, I think this doll sounds great. It saddens me that people would make a big stink over it.

   Reply
4. Mardi

   Jul 17, 2011 at 6:35 pm

   I agree with Jennifer,we don’t have toys with batteries.My little ones breastfeed their baby dolls,and they like to be realistic,by lifting up their shirts to feed them.Not sure if flower patches would be a hit.

   Reply
5. Bon

   Jul 17, 2011 at 6:44 pm

   the ‘flowers’? sound like things that would get lost under my couch.

   but it’s still a really cool idea.

   and Busy Working Mama? my experience has been that preschoolers who live with breastfed babies mimic breastfeeding. taught or not. they perceive that that’s one of the main things you DO with a baby, one of the big parts of caring for one. and so they do it. and it’s pretty sweet.

   even if my two-year-old son doing it in front of elderly aunts and uncles did get a few nervous titters. 😉 ahem.

   Reply
6. Michelle Fix

   Jul 17, 2011 at 10:50 pm

   This is ridiculous. We Western cultures are really pathetic if we have the time and money to create something this frivolous and unnecessary when other peoples of the world are struggling just to stay alive. It’s perfectly natural that children mimic their mothers and it’s great that they understand what breast-feeding is, but this is a total waste of money. And it’s adding even more plastic to the earth, which we certainly don’t need. Nor do kids have to have something so specific that they can’t use a regular doll, or a stuffed animal or a pillow to imitate the exactly same thing. When are we going to stop making more unnecessary objects that just get consumed and thrown away?

   Reply
7. Mary B

   Jul 17, 2011 at 11:20 pm

   I just don’t think it’s necessary to have the sucking action. Kids who witness breastfeeding as a natural part of parenting will, in turn, hold their baby dolls up to their chest to mimic the action. All you really need to do is toss the plastic baby bottles and model breastfeeding as “normal.”

   Reply
8. Sara

   Jul 18, 2011 at 1:26 am

   Yes my kids have been known to attempt breastfeeding dolls, monkeys, bears and other animals from the menagerie.

   But we too are a no battery household so maybe one of the kids can breastfeed the doll while the other makes real suckling action noise?

   Also, I’d like to know when the company will be releasing the pretend breastpump for the preschool mom on the go.

   Reply
9. Tamara

   Jul 18, 2011 at 1:03 am

   : ) my daughter just holds her babydolls up to her chest, there isn’t even any shirt lifting but we both know what the dolly is doing and hooray for her!
   Along with Jennifer & Mardi I think it’s better to invest in your child’s imagination and while my kids all know about and are comfortable discussing breastfeeding and how clever mammals are in general, there is no chance I’d consider purchasing this toy as I also agree with Busyworkingmama – including fake boobies with the doll is just plain creepy/disturbing!

   Reply
10. Cool Mom Picks

    Jul 18, 2011 at 7:01 am

    Yikes, there are no fake boobies!

    Reply
11. Brandi

    Jul 18, 2011 at 8:15 am

    Some children are going to naturally want to pretend to nurse their babydolls. I don’t believe they need the additional encouragement of a doll made specifically for breastfeeding. I’m not opposed to this doll…just find it a bit unnecessary.

    Reply
12. Jill

    Jul 18, 2011 at 8:48 am

    I think it’s sweet! If I had a kid interested in dolls I would totally buy this. I don’t think it’s creepy like some people do, I think it’s totally normal for little kids to mimic their mothers.

    Reply
13. Alison

    Jul 18, 2011 at 8:51 am

    My 3-year-old son is very realistic breastfeederof all his various toys, complete with the lifting of the shirt. No batteries required here.

    Reply
14. Vicky

    Jul 18, 2011 at 9:49 am

    My kids just used the regular dolls to breast feed. I don’t think they need a special doll to do it.

    Reply
15. K

    Jul 18, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    I think the dolls are cute but I don’t like the idea of the sucking action. My daughter does try to breastfeed her babies even without the accessories. I think that’s natural. This doll makes me uneasy because I don’t care for extra emphasis on the breasts with the flowers. I don’t think there is anything ‘wrong’ with this doll, it just doesn’t feel right to me. Then again, I am not the mother that is comfortable breastfeeding in public….

    Reply
16. Traci

    Jul 18, 2011 at 2:47 pm

    I agree with the majority here. I absolutely do not consider this toy “creepy” or wrong… just unnecessary. Just as I don’t buy dolls that pee, I won’t buy an expensive doll just to make nursing more real. My son has “nursed” his toys since the day his baby sister was born. Kids have vivid enough imaginations and they’ll mimic what they see anyway. But, at the same time, I would see nothing wrong with other parents making the choice to buy this doll for their own children!

    Reply
17. JenO

    Jul 18, 2011 at 3:18 pm

    My daughter pulled up her shirt and breastfed every dolly/animal/little duplo person in the house. I can’t imagine paying that much for a doll that makes sucking noises. Especially since in her little cute way she fed every one from her belly button. 😉

    Reply
18. Betsy

    Jul 18, 2011 at 7:03 pm

    I was unable to breastfeed either of my children but I do have several friends who did, so my children were exposed to both methods of making sure babies received their required nutrition. I love it when kids playact what they see, but putting on fake boobs and making them look like flowers is taking it the wrong way I think.

    Reply
19. Heather S

    Jul 19, 2011 at 9:42 am

    It is my firm belief that while things may be good and pure in a certain setting (marital sex, for one)it doesn’t need to parlay into our children’s toys. If a child wants to pretend to breastfeed her baby doll because that is what she’s seen, fine. However, selling a doll and harness for the sole purpose of having a “breast-fed” baby doll smacks not only of maybe an *agenda,* but also reminds me that we have issues these days with just letting kids be kids. Too much too soon can cause our children to carry a burden of knowledge they simply don’t need.

    Reply
20. Cool Mom Picks

    Jul 19, 2011 at 10:51 am

    Heather, respectfully…children see their mothers breastfeed their baby siblings all the time. Is that “too much too soon?”

    Reply
21. Nikki F

    Jul 19, 2011 at 10:01 pm

    I think this is just ridiculous! I am pro-breastmilk fed babies but come on… Who wants their little girl using her body in this kind of manner!?! I don’t even have girls and don’t think that I could be ok with this. If someone would give it to them I’d tell them to take it back!

    Reply
22. Jo

    Jul 21, 2011 at 12:28 am

    Heather S & Nikki F, I’m sure I’ll get jabbed at, but I totally agree with your comments.
    Older siblings help moms by helping to feed a baby brother or sister by holding a bottle. Why make a doll that a child can simulate breastfeeding when it isn’t what they aren’t even able to do in real life at that age! It’s pushing children in to trying to act older than they are. Now maybe if this doll was meant for pregnant teens to practice, it could be a hit in the educational field of parents to be.

    Reply
23. Ari

    Jul 21, 2011 at 9:38 pm

    As I’m sure you have heard, the doll is criticized for “oversexualizing” young girls who play with them. Some go as far as insinuating that the doll will encourage young women to get pregnant at a very young age. I see no reason for alarm here. If anything, the doll might be one outlet for girls to identify with their mothers and explore their feelings about being a woman. At an age where children do not have the verbal and cognitive capacity to speak about their feelings and reflect the way most adults do, fantasy play is their form of expression. Through play, children explore and make sense of their internal and external world. The “Breast Milk Baby” is one outlet for this exploration and in my opinion, not unlike the anatomically correct, urinating baby, doctor set, mini strollers and bottles. That being said, it is not necessary to have a doll of this kind. The imaginative minds of many young children can engage in rich fantasy play without such a realistic aid, but I do not think such a product is detrimental.

    Ari Fox, LCSW
    http://www.copewithschool.com
    Child and Adolescent Therapist

    Reply
24. Riki

    Jul 22, 2011 at 12:56 am

    I love it. Barbie can have big huge fake boobs but heaven forbid there is a doll that actually teaches kids that boobs are not just sex symbols!!!!

    Reply
25. Anne-Marie Somers

    Jul 24, 2011 at 11:18 am

    Trust me, the little girls who have siblings who are breastfed are pretending to breast feed anyway. I did with my little sister. I would just stick my doll up my shirt or remove my shirt. I breastfed my son till he was 28 months and frankly I never thought once in my life that I wouldn’t. Probably the early association in my mind that you breastfeed babies!

    Reply
26. stacy

    Jul 24, 2011 at 1:30 pm

    I don’t get what the big issue is–breastfeeding is a beautiful thing and the best thing for our babes. Breasts are breasts–big deal, why can’t we acquire a more European attitude of acceptance around bodies? Grrrr, this doll is great! To the person who commented about a 4-year-old being exposed, kids of all ages see people breastfeeding and they learn what it is by exposure-it’s a good thing! Gotta love this doll!

    Reply
27. Kristie

    Jul 27, 2011 at 3:03 pm

    First, I don’t think simulating breast-feeding, even with a little flower vest to mark the nipples and sucking noises, is sexualizing anyone. It’s no different than imitating any other parenting behavior with dolls – like changing diapers or pushing around a stroller. You’d have to view breastfeeding as sexual or the breasts as purely sexual objects to take that view. Ask yourself why you would think that way in the first place. But I agree that an expensive gadgety doll is not really needed. Kids will breastfeed any old doll. And little boys pretending to breastfeed is not “confusing” to them unless we make it so. They’re just mimicking a nurturing act, which is great! Trust me, they’ll figure out that their nipples don’t do that eventually without any trauma whatsoever. I personally don’t like to see dolls that come with bottles. But I’m sure formula companies love them.

    Reply
28. EllenID

    Aug 1, 2011 at 11:17 am

    Kristie expressed a lot of what I am feeling very well. I am of two minds. One is that it is great to see a toy that reflects the totally natural and biologically preferable act of breastfeeding. We all know, unfortunately, that it is almost impossible to prevent our kids from being influenced by the commercial world around them. Right now, the bias is toward bottles and formula. It’s about time breastfeeding gets reinforcement in the toy world.
    At the same time, I agree that it is a gimmick that is unnecessary for play. My daughters were both breastfeed and when they played with toys, the dolls got both breast and bottle. All they need is the doll and their imagination…no sucking noises, no flowers.

    Reply